Claim lab
Every important statement gets a state: primary, observed, reported, conflicting or unverified. Confidence is never used to cover a missing source.
Australia legal status
ACMA says online casinos are prohibited interactive gambling services for people in Australia.
Open fileConflictOperator & licence conflict
Secondary sources name different operators and licensing jurisdictions; the conflict remains unresolved.
Open fileObservedOfficial-site access log
Our visual visit reached a regional-unavailability screen rather than public terms.
Open fileReportedWelcome-pack ledger
The four-deposit package as reported by third parties, with every term kept provisional.
Open fileUnverifiedA$1,000 double / no wagering?
Why this requested claim cannot be published as fact and what the available reporting says instead.
Open fileClaim checkThe reported 40× rule
What “bonus ×40” would mean and why scope, contribution and expiry still matter.
Open fileVIPFifty-level VIP structure
A secondary-source map of the published level concept, stripped of reward hype.
Open fileClaim checkThe level-50 Porsche claim
A visual claim recorded in a third-party screenshot; eligibility and delivery evidence are not public here.
Open fileConflict8,700 or 9,000+ games?
Two numbers appear in the same secondary review, illustrating why catalogue counts decay quickly.
Open fileSafetyControl tools audit
Reported support-mediated limits versus a self-service dashboard: a material usability distinction.
Open fileAccessRegional restrictions
A changing country list should be checked at account and payment stage, not inferred from marketing.
Open fileMethodsSource change log
Dated observations, corrections and the evidence state attached to each important statement.
Open file